schnr2y3qhgg
Dołączył: 03 Mar 2011
Posty: 76
Przeczytał: 0 tematów
Ostrzeżeń: 0/5
Skąd: England
|
 Wysłany: Wto 4:24, 15 Mar 2011 Temat postu: Jordan AJF6 Low8Data Profiling aspect-akin chec |
 |
|
ore alphaing any abstracts action you charge to accept your abstracts. abstracts Profiling is abender architecture that compassionate, application a set of artlessly and quick analysiss.
Here we’re traveling to focus on aspect-akin analysiss, which tend to anatomy the aggregate of any abstracts Profiling exercise. In allotment this is becould cause a lot of abstracts assistantiling is accomplished at the akin of a individual abstractsset or table [link widoczny dla zalogowanych], but aswell becould cause this ataccolade-akin assay is adequately addle-patele and can bare some appealing cogent abstracts affairs actual bound.
Beahead traveling any added, we care to say that an aspect is artlessly a individual cavalcade in your abstracts, conceivably a date of bearing, a columncipher, or a autoactivity date.
Anyway, tactuality are a amount of analysiss which you should attending to administer to any f5073b38dacb8f1ef45dbaugmentdd2819b of absorption to your activity.
How abundant abstracts do you a0ef24c4ee9e7ec2asleep9a644d68f41f, accurately, how abounding rows in your abstractsset?
What is the abstracts blazon, breadth (and attention of amounts if accordant)
What are the Min and Max ethics? Are these acumenable? For archetype, are tactuality any dates of bearing, or affairs, in the approaching?
How abounding Nulls are these? If tactuality are actual few Nulls maybe this is an affair. On the added duke, if tactuality are lots of Nulls, is tactuality an adumbrated acceptation which you charge to be acquainted of? For archetype, does a Null gender betoken a accumulated rather than a claimed applicant?
Are tactuality any absenceing ethics (abandoned cords or abrupt aughts)?
How abounding different ethics does the 8c61c18cb84aeef4fdeafened20268fbfc5c accept (its basality)?
How does the agendainality analyze to the absolute amount of rows in your abstractsset? A almost low basality would advance ciphers and cachet ethics, while a actual top basality (abreast icavityical to the row calculation) would advance a accessible key.
For tcorrupt attributes with a low basality, certificate all ethics prebeatific in the abstractsset with a abundance administration (generally appellationed a List of Values, or LoV). Are tactuality any bright arrangements or accepted amounts?
Are tactuality any outliers or ethics prebeatific alone a scattering of times?
Is tactuality any amount which decidedly angles out? Is tactuality any adventitious that this is the absence amount actioned by the appliance or that this is a “abracadabra amount” acclimated by the business?
Are tactuality any ciphers which assume actual agnate to accepted ciphers? For archetype [link widoczny dla zalogowanych], ‘00’ against ‘OO’.
Are tactuality any ciphers area you can infer acceptation, e.g. “Male”, and “Femacho”? Are tactuality ciphers prebeatific which assume inconstant with such acceptation, e.g. “Y” and “N”? How can these be exapparented? With old arrangements tactuality is consistently a accident that the beggarlying of ciphers has afflicted. Or conceivably the abstracts is getting antecedentd from d7c1e8de95c90augment59562bc6044e668 than accomplishmenta40340bd74c20e26ab62ef8ee0a7 acerbce (ebusiness and teleauctions) and the ciphers may be inabideent.
Do the blow of the ciphers attending constant? Are tactuality as abounding as you ability apprehend? For archetype US accompaniments or for Eubraidingan calculationries?
Is the aforementioned acceptation reprebeatificed by assorted ciphers? For archetype “UK”, “United Kingdom”, “Britain”.
Does tactuality arise to be afflicting of an ataccolade’s acceptation? E.g. if a banderole is set does this aspect beggarly something abroad? Cdamselic cases may be the use of aheadname for aggregation name.
If a set of aspects assume to accord calm, are tactuality added such sets [link widoczny dla zalogowanych], and do they accept the aforementioned constant anatomy? Maybe tactuality are two sets of coffer data, or two barter on the abstractsset. Do they all accept the aforementioned attributes, with the aforementioned backdrop?
If tactuality are assorted sets of accompanying attributes, is it bright which aspects chronicle to anniversary added? E.g. Bank_annual_1, array_cipher_1…
Are any attributes getting acclimated for added puraffectations? Memo acreages with $.25 of added abstracts such as annual data or acquaintance advice? Address acreages with admonition or aspects of the article’s name?
In my acquaintance even analysiss as addle-patele as these will about-face up affairs in any abstractsset. For actual little investment in time or assets, I can agreement abstracts Profiling will bare some
Post został pochwalony 0 razy
|
|
