 |
| j0u0nminhy |
 Wysłany: Sob 15:53, 23 Kwi 2011 Temat postu: Puma Espera White Is Nuendo The Ri Puma Espera Whi |
|
Tools, Cubase, Nuendo, SONAR, Acid, Digital Performer http://www.pumas.cc/puma-speed-cat, & Logic. These are the most popular digital audio programs for logging and mixing music. With so many choices it can seem complicated to know which one you should choose but once you consider what type of computer you are using and what type of music you want to make you'll find that numerous of the choices are excluded which in rotate makes your choice far easier.
There are a lot of things to consider when making this choice. The first is what variety of computer system you are using.
I am not going to acquaint you if you ought use a PC or a Mac as I detect that dialectic quite boring. You tin establish a top quality computer based music laboratory with a PC alternatively a Mac. That being said, it is important to think what type of computer you are using when choosing your music software because some programs only work with an alternatively the other (or go much better with 1 or the other.)
If you are basing your system on a PC then you at the outset absence to cross MOTU's Digital Performer and Apple's Logic off your account for they are Mac only procedures. I would likewise inform you apt not prefer Pro Tools if you're ashore a PC.
Yes, I know Pro Tools is the "industry standard" but that's mostly because people love to do what everybody another is doing. There's naught special approximately Pro Tools. Sure it's a great chip of software, but so is Nuendo.
And the problem is that Pro Tools equitable isn't a good choice for PC users. Currently it doesn't even work with Windows Vista and when the next edition is conceived to be Vista compatible we don't know when that version will be accessible and even then, it will only be compatible with the "Ultimate" version of Vista (if you currently own the normal version of Vista that will be a $200 upgrade.) On top of that Puma Espera White, even on XP Pro Tools doesn't work almost as well as it does on the Mac. It's definitely a good choice for Mac users Puma Future Cat, but you should avoid it if you are on the PC.
So what's left as PC users? Steinberg's Nuendo & Cubase forward with Sony's Acid and Cakewalk's SONAR. Acid & SONAR are only to be used along Windows based microprocessor yet Steinberg's Nuendo & Cubase are well suited for either Windows PCs and Macs.
If you are seeing for the best audio quality you can get (and you're compliant to pay more for it) and you do not use MIDI very many then Nuendo is probably your best choice. It's also the right choice for those working with audio for use with movie and for those interested in working with circle sound.
Cubase & Sonar are great choices for those who use MIDI a lot. But you shouldn't think that these programs are only for MIDI, they also work exceptionally well for recording and mixing audio.
Sony's Acid is for loop based music like techno and hip hop. Really, I don't muse it's a quite good fit for maximum people. Unless you make loop based music, don't choose Acid.
Mac users will probably end going with Pro Tools but Digital Performer & Logic are also excellent choices. I would suggest downloading the demo versions of each of these programs and looking which one works for you. You may also want to go with Nuendo or Cubase. Remember that software also works well on PCs so it may make you extra versatile to some extent to learn those programs. |
|
|
|
|
|