 |
| nyenaceyg |
 Wysłany: Wto 10:24, 08 Lut 2011 Temat postu: Sino-US comparison of corporate managers decision- |
|
Sino-US comparison of corporate managers decision-making
Problem, have the final say on the issue. For this, the Chinese side in the management of the interview affirmed. They believe the United States under the senior managers will usually set a target, and then is to achieve this goal by subordinates and results, senior managers who are results-to measurable goals, as the middle of what kind of way to do, he basically would not intervention. Department manager of any class, can be within the scope of the department to make decisions, how to get the job done, they do not violate the company's business ethics can be. For example, internal staff recruitment, promotion, salary adjustment for each employee are determined by the department manager. In other words,tory burch reva, every department, no matter how small you are a manager, as long as you have under the employee, go to your departmental management, then you will have full authority to manage. 2. Decision-making individualism. American culture which emphasizes the individual characteristics of individual attention, combined with managers of U.S. companies which usually have management experience in the theory and practice, so they pay more attention to their own personal decision-making will, therefore subjective than others. This is also in the interviews as a criticism of the Chinese managers behavioral characteristics, the management of their own way that the United States, usually the abuse of power, said: decision-making. According to modern management theory, this personal decision making has its merits,moncler sito ufficiale, namely, the concentration of power, accountability, direction sensitive, fast, high efficiency, but also easy-to-leading performance assessment. But the corresponding has its shortcomings, namely, by the personal ability, knowledge, energy, higher limits, if monitoring mechanism is not complete or are not effective, easy to produce personal dictatorship. As we mentioned above, increasing in firm size,timberland portugal, market conditions were rapidly changing, modern economy, this personal decision-making is increasingly showing its limitations and drawbacks. Many U.S. scientists also have found the management of U.S. companies this way the limitations of individual decision making, Harvard University management experts have pointed out that the Lodge has always been the guiding values of individualism, the U.S. economy has been unable to adapt to the new environment, you need to Japan's Group Learning, proposed rule Management guru Peter Drucker also believes that Japanese companies In summary, the cultural differences the two sides formed a different management decision-making behavior. Indeed, as Chen Zhenxiong pointed out, in the internal management of Sino-US joint venture,moncler paris, the American-style management system occupies a dominant position, while the U.S. is the learn foreign advanced management ideas and management methods of the best schools. But we can not thus believes that the joint venture's management decisions should be individual decisions by the United States to dominate managers Moreover, it is not the American way is the only right way, that even the Americans themselves admit, a U.S. General Manager In an interview on the deep feeling that good, although most people do not admit it. economic relations of mutual checks and balances. The party holds a majority stake in the location or the possession of the party chairman should not be forced to make decisions, or will ruin the future of the joint venture. Shared decision-making as an effective mechanism for joint decision-making, first layer of the board of directors and senior managers to carry out, these measures should include: (1) corporate charter, joint decision-making system to determine the requirements. (2) written or approved both the unity of decision-making model to coordinate their interests, thinking, and making the results of consultation. (3) the implementation of shared decision-making joint efforts in this way. (4) the overall interests of the joint venture as the fundamental starting point of joint decision-making and decision-making effectiveness of the final evaluation point. People from different countries or closer for the common purpose of a partnership business venture, formed a joint venture. Business operation and development of good cooperation and requires all parties to the overall coordination. In the decision-making by cross-cultural understanding and successful management of business management is undoubtedly the key to success, as a Sino-US joint venture, the Chinese manager,ugg boots günstig, wrote in a report: some ways of thinking and values of people of different co-management of an enterprise There's nothing harmonious asked senior staff to work more important. Managers hope that both sides can be human-Kam, run joint ventures. MEE |
|
|
|
|
|